Understanding verbs 1
In this post I have explained some basic notions for which I believe to be central to understanding of verbs, especially full verbs.
MAIN MORPHOLOGICAL FORMS
Regular verbs have four morphological forms; irregular verbs
can have more or less than four:
- base form (plan, sing, cut, etc.)
- -s form (plans, sings, cuts, etc.)
- -ing form (planning, singing,
cutting, etc.)
- -ed form (planned, sang, cut, etc.) –this form is the same for both
the past participle and the passive participle
* verb CUT has only three distinct morphological forms (base form: cut;
-s form: cuts; -ing form: cutting; -ed form = base form)
* verb SPEAK has five morphological
forms (base form: speak; -s form: speaks; -ing form: speaking; the past form:
spoke; the -ed participle: spoken)
Since the –s form and –ing form are
always predictable for both regular and irregular verbs (e.g. plans/cuts; planning/cutting/speaking), the only forms that
are listed for irregular verbs are the base form, the past form and the –ed participle,
these three forms are known as the PRINCIPAL PARTS of the verb.
These main four forms (or more forms for irreg. v.) are all we need to express different contrasts in a verb phrase, e.g. tense (strictly speaking, there are only two - present and past) works vs. worked; aspect (the perfect or progressive) does (no aspect) vs. has done (the perfect) vs. is writing (progressive) vs. has been writing (perfect and progressive), etc.
This is something you will be able to see for yourself after studying the list of grammatical tenses shown below.
E.g. In simple present (only the tense is expressed); present perfect (tense + the perfect aspect); present perfect cont. (tense + both aspects); present perfect continuous passive (tense + both aspects + voice):
MAJOR VERB CLASSES
There are three major verb classes:
- primary verbs (be, have, do)
- modal auxiliaries (can, may, will, etc.)
- full verbs (believe, speak, etc.)
The primary verbs can function as auxiliaries or main verbs in a sentence, modal auxiliaries can only function as auxiliary verbs and full verbs can only be main verbs.
It is also useful to know that modal auxiliaries can be further divided into the central modal auxiliaries (can/could, may/might, must, will/would, shall/should); the marginal modal auxiliaries (used to, ought to, need, dare), modal idioms (had better, would rather, be to, have got to, etc.) and semi-auxiliaries (be able to, be about to, be going to, be bound to, be due to, have to, be supposed to, etc.)
Secondly, modal verbs and primary verbs used as auxiliaries do not have all the morphological forms described above. They are different from full verbs in many respects, which requires a lot of further elaboration and therefore another post.
And finally, here are some useful lists of verb phrases:
INFINITIVES
PRESENT
INFINITIVE
|
to work
|
to do
|
PRESENT
CONTINUOUS INFINITIVE
|
to be working
|
to be doing
|
PERFECT
INFINITIVE
|
to have worked
|
to have done
|
PERFECT
CONTINUOUS INFINITIVE
|
to have been
working
|
to have been
doing
|
PRESENT
INFINITIVE PASSIVE
|
to be done
|
|
PERFECT
INFINITIVE PASSIVE
|
to have been
done
|
* work is a transitive verb only in some senses
Note
Sometimes essentially the same structures are called or described differently, depending on the approach. According to Quirk & Greenbaum (A student's grammar of the English language)
Sometimes essentially the same structures are called or described differently, depending on the approach. According to Quirk & Greenbaum (A student's grammar of the English language)
Present inf. = simple (nonperfect, nonprogressive) infinitive (i.e. no aspect* expressed)
Present cont. inf. = expressed progressive aspect in an
infinitive phrase
Perfect inf. = expressed perfect aspect in an infinitive
phrase
Perfect cont. inf. = expressed both perf. and progressive
aspect in an inf. phrase
Passive infinitive(s) = expressed passive voice in an
infinitive phrase
*The perfect conveys the meaning of "an event which started at some point in the past and lasted up to the present moment" (the present moment now or in the past); and the progressive conveys the meaning of "an event in progress", and it also conveys the meaning of "temporariness" and sometimes "incompleteness".
** Infinitive is the only nonfinite (the verb phrase which cannot function as the main verb of an independent clause) verb phrase that can have all the combinations of aspects expressed in it (this is not the case with -ing participles or -ed participles).
PARTICIPLES (AND GERUNDS)
-ing participle
PRESENT
PARTICIPLE
|
working
|
doing
|
PERFECT
PARTICIPLE
|
having worked
|
having done
|
PRESENT
PARTICIPLE PASSIVE
|
being done
|
|
PERFECT
PARTICIPLE PASSIVE
|
having been
done
|
*GERUNDS have the same forms as the participles.
Note (according to Quirk):
- present participle = -ing participle
- perfect participle= expressed perfect aspect in an –ing
participle
- passive forms = expressed passive voice in an –ing
participle (alone or combined with expressed perfect aspect)
* progressive aspect in an –ing participle may be expressed
only in contrast with an infinitive, where an infinitive conveys the meaning of a completed action, while an -ing participle expresses the progressive aspect and implies incompleteness (e.g I saw them stealing the car. vs. I saw them steal the car.)
-ed participle
PAST PARTICIPLE
|
worked
|
done
|
* The aspects cannot be expressed formally in -ed participle, this can be achieved only through contrasts:
- with passive –ing participle (present participle passive, e.g. being done) the progressive/nonprogressive aspect is expressed:
The parcel was delivered. vs. The parcel was being delivered.
The parcel was delivered. vs. The parcel was being delivered.
- with perfect passive –ing participle
(perf. participle passive, e.g. having been reprimanded) the perfect/nonperfect aspect is expressed:
Reprimanded for being late, he blushed. vs.
Having been reprimanded for being late, he blushed.
Reprimanded for being late, he blushed. vs.
Having been reprimanded for being late, he blushed.
TRADITIONAL
GRAMMAR
|
MORPHOSYNTAX (Quirk)
|
present participle (+ passive)
|
- ing participle (+ passive)
|
perfect participle (+ passive)
|
= -ing part. with perf. aspect (+passive)
|
past participle
|
- ed participle
|
TENSES – ACTIVE AND PASSIVE
TENSE
|
ACTIVE
|
PASSIVE
|
SIMPLE PRESENT
|
keeps
|
is kept
|
PRESENT CONTINUOUS
|
is keeping
|
is being kept
|
SIMPLE PAST
|
kept
|
was kept
|
PAST CONTINUOUS
|
was keeping
|
was being kept
|
PRESENT PERFECT
|
has kept
|
has been kept
|
PRESENT PERF. CONT.
|
has been keeping
|
has been being kept
|
PAST PERFECT
|
had kept
|
had been kept
|
PAST PERF.CONT.
|
had been keeping
|
had been being kept
|
FUTURE
|
will keep
|
will be kept
|
(PRES.) CONDITIONAL
|
would keep
|
would be kept
|
PAST CONDITIONAL
|
would have kept
|
would have been kept
|
* present perf. c. and past perfect continuous are rarely used
in passive voice.
* strictly speaking future is not a tense because there is no inflection for future, it is only expressed by various means depending on what meaning we want to convey.
Comments
Post a Comment