Understanding verbs 1




In this post I have explained some basic notions for which I believe to be central to understanding of verbs, especially full verbs.

MAIN MORPHOLOGICAL FORMS


Regular verbs have four morphological forms; irregular verbs can have more or less than four:
- base form (plan, sing, cut, etc.)
- -s form (plans, sings, cuts, etc.)
- -ing form (planning,  singing, cutting, etc.)
- -ed form (planned, sang, cut, etc.) –this form is the same for both the past participle and the passive participle

* verb CUT has only three distinct morphological forms (base form: cut; -s form: cuts; -ing form: cutting; -ed form = base form)

* verb SPEAK has five morphological forms (base form: speak; -s form: speaks; -ing form: speaking; the past form: spoke; the -ed participle: spoken)

Since the –s form and –ing form are always predictable for both regular and irregular verbs (e.g. plans/cuts; planning/cutting/speaking), the only forms that are listed for irregular verbs are the base form, the past form and the –ed participle, these three forms are known as the PRINCIPAL PARTS of the verb. 

These main four forms (or more forms for irreg. v.) are all we need to express different contrasts in a verb phrase, e.g. tense (strictly speaking, there are only two - present and past) works vs. worked; aspect (the perfect or progressive) does (no aspect) vs. has done (the perfect) vs. is writing (progressive) vs. has been writing (perfect and progressive), etc.
This is something you will be able to see for yourself after studying the list of grammatical tenses shown below.

E.g. In simple present (only the tense is expressed); present perfect (tense + the perfect aspect); present perfect cont. (tense + both aspects); present perfect continuous passive (tense + both aspects + voice):


MAJOR VERB CLASSES

There are three major verb classes:

- primary verbs (be, have, do)
- modal auxiliaries (can, may, will, etc.)
- full verbs (believe, speak, etc.)

The primary verbs can function as auxiliaries or main verbs in a sentence, modal auxiliaries can only function as auxiliary verbs and full verbs can only be main verbs. 

It is also useful to know that modal auxiliaries can be further divided into the central modal auxiliaries (can/could, may/might, must, will/would, shall/should); the marginal modal auxiliaries (used to, ought to, need, dare), modal idioms (had better, would rather, be to, have got to, etc.) and semi-auxiliaries (be able to, be about to, be going to, be bound to, be due to, have to, be supposed to, etc.) 

Secondly, modal verbs and primary verbs used as auxiliaries do not have all the morphological forms described above. They are different from full verbs in many respects, which requires a lot of further elaboration and therefore another post.

And finally, here are some useful lists of verb phrases:

INFINITIVES

PRESENT INFINITIVE
to work
to do
PRESENT CONTINUOUS INFINITIVE
to be working
to be doing
PERFECT INFINITIVE
to have worked
to have done
PERFECT CONTINUOUS INFINITIVE
to have been working
to have been doing
PRESENT INFINITIVE PASSIVE

to be done
PERFECT INFINITIVE PASSIVE

to have been done
* work is a transitive verb only in some senses

Note
Sometimes essentially the same structures are called or described differently, depending on the approach. According to Quirk & Greenbaum (A student's grammar of the English language)

Present inf. = simple (nonperfect, nonprogressive) infinitive (i.e. no aspect* expressed)
Present cont. inf. = expressed progressive aspect in an infinitive phrase
Perfect inf. = expressed perfect aspect in an infinitive phrase
Perfect cont. inf. = expressed both perf. and progressive aspect in an inf. phrase
Passive infinitive(s) = expressed passive voice in an infinitive phrase

*The perfect conveys the meaning of "an event which started at some point in the past and lasted up to the present moment" (the present moment now or in the past); and the progressive conveys the meaning of "an event in progress", and it also conveys the meaning of "temporariness" and sometimes "incompleteness".

** Infinitive is the only nonfinite (the verb phrase which cannot function as the main verb of an independent clause) verb phrase that can have all the combinations of aspects expressed in it (this is not the case with -ing participles or -ed participles).



PARTICIPLES (AND GERUNDS)
-ing participle
PRESENT PARTICIPLE
working
doing
PERFECT PARTICIPLE
having worked
having done
PRESENT PARTICIPLE PASSIVE

being done
PERFECT PARTICIPLE PASSIVE

having been done

*GERUNDS have the same forms as the participles.

Note (according to Quirk):

- present participle = -ing participle
- perfect participle= expressed perfect aspect in an –ing participle
- passive forms = expressed passive voice in an –ing participle (alone or combined with expressed perfect aspect)

* progressive aspect in an –ing participle may be expressed only in contrast with an infinitive, where an infinitive conveys the meaning of a completed action, while an -ing participle expresses the progressive aspect and implies incompleteness (e.g I saw them stealing the car. vs. I saw them steal the car.)

-ed participle             
PAST PARTICIPLE
worked
done

* The aspects cannot be expressed formally in -ed participle, this can be achieved only through contrasts:

-  with passive –ing participle (present participle passive, e.g. being done) the progressive/nonprogressive aspect is expressed:
The parcel was delivered. vs. The parcel was being delivered.

- with perfect passive –ing participle (perf. participle passive, e.g. having been reprimanded) the perfect/nonperfect aspect is expressed:
Reprimanded for being late, he blushed. vs.
Having been reprimanded for being late, he blushed.


TRADITIONAL GRAMMAR
MORPHOSYNTAX  (Quirk)
present participle (+ passive)
- ing participle (+ passive)
perfect participle (+ passive)
= -ing part. with perf. aspect (+passive)
past participle
- ed participle





TENSES – ACTIVE AND PASSIVE
TENSE
ACTIVE
PASSIVE
SIMPLE PRESENT
keeps
is kept
PRESENT CONTINUOUS
is keeping
is being kept
SIMPLE PAST
kept
was kept
PAST CONTINUOUS
was keeping
was being kept
PRESENT PERFECT
has kept
has been kept
PRESENT PERF. CONT.
has been keeping
has been being kept
PAST PERFECT
had kept
had been kept
PAST PERF.CONT.
had been keeping
had been being kept
FUTURE
will keep
will be kept
(PRES.) CONDITIONAL
would keep
would be kept
PAST CONDITIONAL
would have kept
would have been kept

* present perf. c.  and past perfect continuous are rarely used in passive voice.
* strictly speaking future is not a tense because there is no inflection for future, it is only expressed by various means depending on what meaning we want to convey.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Position - Adverbs of manner

Englishness

Position - Adverbs of time